Bon je viens bien quelques clefs pour debroussailler cela :
https://github.com/gocircuit/escher
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8057043
Je seche un peu a comprendre le pourquoi du comment du bousin et ce que c’est a quoi ca peut servir.
C’est assez abscon
Est ce que tu as ete lire les liens que tu fournis ? Il y’a quelques explications dans les commentaires du lien ycombinator, ainsi qu’un lien vers une video de conference. En fait tous les commentaires de ycombinator devraient te donner les clefs pour comprendre ca (en survolant rapidement)
[quote=“Ravine, post:2, topic: 55771”][/quote]
Oui mais je ne ne comprends toujours pas le bousin …
Et la video est sur go circuit pas escher
I am glad. The truth is: Eventually every mind, in trying to save itself from "repetitive" work, reaches the same conclusion: recursive metaphorical programming. It comes out in different buzz words "flow-programming", "metaphor mechanics", etc. They are all fuzzy but roughly correct. The only way to propose a theory of 1st-person consciousness, which is not ambiguous (the theory as communicated to others), is to give a programming language. This supersedes a philosophy paper that no one reads and is predicated on the author's "knowledge". And if the author is an academic, they can just assume "people don't know math" and people assume "we don't know math", so no knowledge is transferred at all.
Priceless.
